AI tools for aging in place

What it's genuinely good for. Turning "the bathroom feels unsafe" into a specific list of things to look at. Explaining the difference between clear width and door width before you meet a contractor. Drafting the questions to bring to an Area Agency on Aging call. Summarizing what the ADA's dimensional references are - 32 inches clear at doors, 33-36 inch grab bars rated for 250 pounds of force, a 60-inch turning circle, a 15-48 inch reach range - so you know what to measure. Preparation is the job.

Where it fails, specifically. Coverage questions: no model knows your state's Medicaid waiver status, your VA rating, or your plan's exclusions, and confident-sounding wrong answers here cost vulnerable people real money. Clinical judgment: it cannot watch someone transfer out of a chair, and that observation is the entire value of an OT assessment. Structural judgment: it cannot see whether there's blocking behind your tile. Local rules: permit and code requirements are jurisdiction-specific and change.

Use it to prepare, then verify. The right pattern is to use AI to arrive at your appointments better informed, then let the physician, the occupational therapist, the building department and the benefits agency give you the answers that actually bind. Anything with a dollar figure, a dimension you'll build to, or a safety consequence should be confirmed with a human who can see the thing in question.

One more caution, aimed at a real pattern. If you're an adult child researching remotely at 2 a.m. after a phone call about a fall, an AI tool will happily produce a complete plan and it will feel like progress. Some of it will be right. The part that matters - what your parent can actually do, and what their house will actually allow - cannot come from that conversation. Use the night to write good questions. Make the calls in the morning.