HomeMatchup
How we work

Who can stop a page going out.

Most publishers describe their editorial process as a sequence of steps. The more useful question is who holds authority at each one — because a review stage the writer can overrule is not a review stage, it is a formality with a name.

HomeMatchup is 16 people across editorial, expert review, operations, search, design and engineering. 6 carry bylines and 5 review other people's work. Every page is written by one person and checked by a different one — and our technical reviewer, cost reviewer and verification lead each hold a veto that nobody in the business can override, including the founder.

Accountability

Who owns each stage, and who signs it off.

The last column is the one that matters. Everything else is a job description.

Stage Does the work Signs it off
Commissioning a page Priya SharmaSenior Content Strategist & Editor Emma CollinsHead of Content
Research & sourcing Olivia CarterSEO Content Optimization Specialist Priya SharmaEditor
Writing the draft Aisha RahmanSenior Copywriter Priya SharmaEditor
Technical accuracy Michael ThompsonSenior Home Improvement Reviewer Michael ThompsonExpert reviewer — final say on roofing claims
Cost figures & ranges Sarah WilliamsCost & Technical Review Lead Sarah WilliamsCost review lead — final say on any number
Editorial sign-off Emma CollinsHead of Content Emma CollinsHead of Content
Contractor verification Michael CarterOperations Director Michael CarterOperations — final say on who is listed
Refresh & corrections Olivia CarterSEO Content Optimization Specialist Emma CollinsHead of Content
Sign-off gates

Four vetoes, and who holds them.

A gate is only real if the person holding it can say no to someone more senior. These can.

Michael Thompson, Senior Home Improvement Reviewer at HomeMatchup

A roofing claim cannot ship if Michael blocks it

Technical review is a veto, not an advisory. If our expert reviewer says a claim about how a roof behaves is wrong or unsupportable, the writer does not get to overrule it and neither does the head of content. The claim is corrected or it is cut.

Michael Thompson, Senior Home Improvement Reviewer
Sarah Williams, Cost & Technical Review Lead at HomeMatchup

A number cannot ship if Sarah blocks it

Same authority, over money. Any figure without a source and a retrieval date fails the gate automatically, and a page quoting a single national average does not pass at all. Our cost review lead can hold a finished page indefinitely over one unsourced range.

Sarah Williams, Cost & Technical Review Lead
Michael Carter, Operations Director at HomeMatchup

A contractor cannot be listed if Michael Carter blocks it

Verification is independent of the commercial team, which is the only arrangement that makes it worth anything. Roughly one in three companies that apply do not clear The HomeMatchup Shield — each one is revenue we decline on purpose.

Michael Carter, Operations Director
Jonathan Hayes, Founder & CEO at HomeMatchup

Nobody in the business can override any of the three

Including the founder. The point of a gate that the chief executive can open is that it is not a gate. Where a commercial decision and an editorial one conflict, the editorial one stands and the commercial side takes the loss.

Jonathan Hayes, Founder & CEO
2 people

Leadership

Sets what we will and will not do to make a match — including the revenue we turn down.

2 people

Expert Review

Reads costs, specs and safety claims before publication. Nothing about money or roofs ships unread.

3 people

Content

Writes the guides, cost pages and city pages — in plain English, with the source next to the number.

5 people

SEO

Makes sure the person with the leaking roof at 11pm actually finds the page that answers them.

2 people

Design

Owns the look, the design system, and whether a page reads as honest before a word is read.

2 people

Engineering

Builds and runs the site, the matching flow, and the speed budget every page has to live inside.

Structural independence

Editorial does not report to commercial.

Contractors pay us a referral fee when we match them with a homeowner. That is the entire business model, and it is exactly why the separation is a reporting line rather than a promise on a page. Roughly one in three companies that apply do not clear verification, and each is revenue declined on purpose. Guides that tell a homeowner to repair rather than replace are a normal week's output.

Separate reporting line No pay-to-rank
See the ranking rubric

Where this model is still thin

Two reviewers carry the technical and cost veto for the whole site. That concentration is a strength for consistency and a weakness for capacity — it is the reason some categories publish more slowly than our competitors, and we would rather be slow than wave a page through.

Our reviewers are also in-house rather than an externally credentialed board of licensed roofers, adjusters and engineers. We are commissioning for that: it is paid, contributors are bylined on the pages they touch, and they are explicitly free to tell us in public that we are wrong. Until it exists, we will keep saying it does not. Get in touch if that is you.

Team FAQ

Questions about how we work

Still have a question? Talk to our team →

A team of 16 across editorial, expert review, operations, search, design and engineering. 6 people carry bylines and 5 review other people's work. Every page is commissioned by the content team, written by one person, then checked by a different person for technical accuracy and — separately — for cost accuracy, before the head of content signs it off.
No. Technical review and cost review are vetoes rather than opinions. If our expert reviewer rejects a roofing claim, or our cost review lead rejects a figure, the page is corrected or the section is cut — the writer cannot publish over the objection, and neither can the head of content or the founder.
No, and the reporting structure is deliberate: editorial does not report to commercial. Contractors pay a referral fee when we match them with a homeowner, which is precisely why the separation has to be structural rather than a stated intention. No contractor can buy a mention, a rank, or a change to a page.
Sarah Williams, our Cost & Technical Review Lead, signs off every price range on the site along with the source and date printed beside it. That is a standing responsibility across all cost content rather than a per-page assignment, which is why her name appears as reviewer on cost pages throughout the site.
Our reviewers are experienced in-house specialists — real, named, with their work on every page — but they are not an externally credentialed board of licensed roofers, adjusters and engineers, and we will not describe them as one. That programme is open and paid, contributors are bylined, and they are free to contradict us publicly.
Every content page names its author and reviewer and links to their profile. Corrections go through the contact page and are the cheapest quality control we have, so reporting one is genuinely a favour rather than a complaint.

The job will still be there next month.

It will just cost more, and you will be choosing in a hurry — which is how most people end up with the contractor they regret. Getting matched takes about a minute and costs nothing.

Free • No obligation • Licence & insurance verified

(866) 582-8523 Get my free quote