HomeMatchup
Home Security · Comparisons

Home security comparisons

DIY wireless systems cost less upfront and avoid installation labor of $80 to $400, but you own the setup quality. Professional monitoring adds $3 to $60 a month and a call center that follows a procedure; self-monitoring sends you a notification and leaves the response to you. Wired systems are cheaper in components per Fixr but require professional installation; wireless costs more per component and installs yourself.

DIY versus professional installation. Fixr describes wired systems as "typically less expensive than wireless system components" while requiring professional installation, and wireless as higher upfront cost but "easy to install and set up by the homeowner." The real difference is not the money, it is placement. A badly positioned motion sensor or a door contact with a gap generates false alarms — and the ASU Center for Problem-Oriented Policing attributes roughly half of all false alarms to user error, with poor installation as another contributor.

Self-monitoring versus professional monitoring. Self-monitoring means the alarm pushes a notification to your phone and you decide what to do. Professional monitoring means a center receives the signal, tries to reach you, and can request police dispatch. Professional monitoring is worth real money if you travel, sleep heavily, have a household that will not reliably check phones, or want the insurance discount. It is worth less if you are always reachable and your main concern is knowing what happened.

Contract versus month-to-month. Fixr notes most standard contracts require three years, with month-to-month available at a higher upfront equipment cost. Month-to-month is almost always the safer purchase for a homeowner who is uncertain, because the downside of being wrong is one month rather than thirty-six. The three-year deal usually looks cheaper monthly because the equipment cost has been buried in it.

Cameras versus alarms. They do different jobs. An alarm is intended to interrupt and summon; a camera records and, sometimes, deters. The ASU research is direct that burglars are "less likely to gain entry when a house has two or more security devices," and that "visibility and accessibility are more important than vulnerability or security" — meaning lighting, sightlines and locks often do more than another camera.

How to choose

Choose month-to-month unless the discount is large and certain
The multi-year deal is priced for the company's certainty, not yours. Compute the total both ways before deciding.
Pick self-monitoring only if someone will actually respond
An alert nobody sees is not security. Be honest about your household's phone habits.
Fix the basics before adding devices
ASU's burglary research puts visibility and accessibility above security hardware. Trimmed sightlines, solid locks and lighting first.
If you DIY, test every sensor before arming
User error and bad installation drive false alarms, and false alarms cost you fines and credibility with dispatch.
Compare equipment ownership, not just price
A cheap contract with leased gear locks you in. Owned equipment keeps you free to switch monitoring providers.
0 of 5 live

All home security comparisons

Diy vs Professional Monitoring

Adt vs Vivint

Simplisafe vs Ring

Wired vs Wireless Security

Local vs Cloud Storage

FAQ

Home Security comparisons — common questions

Still have a question? Talk to our team →

The hardware often is. The difference is installation quality and monitoring. If you place sensors carefully, test them, and either self-monitor attentively or buy professional monitoring separately, DIY can be equivalent for far less money. If you would rather someone else be accountable for it working, pay for the install.
It depends on whether anyone will respond to a phone alert. Monitoring at $3 to $60 a month buys a call center that follows a procedure when you cannot. It also unlocks the larger insurance discounts — the Insurance Information Institute notes some insurers cut premiums 15 to 20 percent for monitored systems that ring at a monitoring station.
Fixr describes wired components as typically cheaper but needing professional installation, and wireless as more expensive per component but homeowner-installable. Wired is more robust against interference and battery failure; wireless is far easier to expand and to take with you. For most existing homes, wireless wins on practicality.
Neither, first. Locks, lighting and sightlines come first — the ASU Center for Problem-Oriented Policing finds visibility and accessibility matter more to burglars than security devices do. After that, an alarm interrupts an intrusion in progress; a camera mostly documents it. Buy for the outcome you actually want.
Sources

Where these figures come from

You know more than the last homeowner they quoted.

That is worth something only while you are still choosing. Tell us what is going on and we will match you with a few home security pros whose licence and insurance we have already checked — free, no obligation.

Get matched free

Free · No pressure · We never sell your details

(866) 582-8523 Get my free quote