Services
No services match that search.
Browse by type
ChecklistsCompared honestlyWhat everything costsDecision guidesQuestions & answersPlain-English glossaryGuides & how-tosSomething wrong at home?Research & dataCalculators & tools BlogMore
Full services directory How it worksFor prosAbout Get matched Call (866) 582-8523Firefighting water mixes with soot and char, soaks materials that were already burned, and runs through your insurance as a fire claim rather than a water one. All three change how this job is done.
Fire water damage is the water damage left behind by extinguishing a fire — hose water, sprinkler discharge, and the runoff that carries soot and char through the building. It is treated differently from an ordinary water loss for three reasons: the water is carrying combustion residue, the materials it soaked were already heat and smoke damaged, and it is handled under your fire claim, not as a separate water claim.
Seeing something not on this list? Browse water restoration problems by symptom →
Structure clearance and board-up first
Nothing starts until the fire service releases the building and any investigation is complete. Openings are then boarded and the roof tarped, because an unsecured fire-damaged building takes on more weather and is a security exposure while you are not living in it.
Watch for: Anyone offering to begin cleanup before the scene is released, or before an investigation into the fire's cause has finished. Disturbing the scene can complicate both the investigation and the claim.
Water removal, but with soot in the water
Extraction happens as it would elsewhere, with the difference that the water carries suspended combustion residue. Anything it flowed across is soiled as well as wet, and residue settles as the water drains — so the boundary of the damage is wider than the fire's footprint.
Watch for: Wet soot being wiped or scrubbed on the spot. Wet residue smears and drives into porous surfaces, and a surface that could have been cleaned dry can become permanently marked by an over-eager first pass.
Sequencing soot cleaning against drying
Fire restoration and water restoration want opposite things from the timeline: residue removal generally goes better before surfaces are saturated further, while drying needs to start quickly to limit secondary damage. Reconciling those two on one building is the technical core of this job.
Watch for: A firm that is genuinely a water restorer being asked to handle soot, or a fire firm subcontracting the drying without owning the schedule. Ask who is sequencing the two scopes, because somebody has to.
Salvage decisions on already-damaged material
A wet stud that is also charred, wet insulation that also absorbed smoke, a wet cabinet run that also holds odour — the question is not just whether it can be dried but whether it is worth drying. Much of what would be saved in a plain water loss is replaced here.
Watch for: Contents being written off wholesale before any inventory exists. Even in a bad fire, a documented inventory is the basis of the contents part of your settlement and it is worth insisting on.
Odour, which outlasts everything else
Smoke odour survives drying and repainting and often becomes noticeable again as the building warms up months later. It usually requires removal of the materials holding it and treatment of what remains, and it is the most common reason a fire job is reopened after sign-off.
Watch for: Odour treatment described only as sealing and painting. Sealing over residue that is still present is a deferral, not a fix, and you will meet it again in the first warm week.
Fire losses with significant water damage commonly run from about $10,000 into six figures, because the water and fire scopes are additive and much of what is wet is also burned or smoke damaged, so it is replaced rather than dried.
See the full fire water damage cost guide — by material, size and region →
Everyone else ranking for this is paid when you say yes. Here's when you shouldn't.
Do you handle both fire and water scopes in-house, or is one subcontracted?
Either can work, but one party has to own the sequencing between residue removal and drying. If neither firm claims it, nobody is doing it.
What is your plan for odour, beyond sealing and painting?
Odour is the most common reason a completed fire job comes back. A firm with a specific plan has done this before; a firm that says "we will seal it" has not thought past handover.
How will contents be inventoried before anything is disposed of?
The contents portion of a fire settlement rests on an inventory. Once items are in a skip, they are difficult to claim for and impossible to reassess.
Is this being handled as one fire claim covering both the fire and water damage?
It normally is, and confirming it early prevents the water portion being pushed into a separate conversation or a separate deductible.
What are you securing tonight, and is board-up separately priced?
Emergency securing is a small, urgent, standalone scope. Keeping it separate means you can authorise it without committing to the whole restoration.
Who assesses whether charred structural members are sound once dried?
Char depth and structural adequacy are an engineering judgement, not a restoration technician one. Ask who is making the call and on what basis.
Local pro matching for fire water damage is rolling out by metro. Enter your ZIP and we'll match you with vetted pros in your area today.
Tell us what you need and we'll match you with vetted local water restoration pros — free.